Subject	Re: I'd widen #4 to .0015 Tight is never good on Bearings
Posted by	Placuch on August 19, 2016 at 6:38 PM
	This message has been viewed 275 times.
In Reply To	I'd widen #4 to .0015 Tight is never good on Bearings (n/m) posted by Cjw3 on August 19, 2016 at 06:14 PM
Message	Thank you for your response Cjw3. How would you suggest to do that? Is some very fine grit sand paper appropriate to use? Are there 0.0005" undersized bearings available? What about #2 and #3, would you say 0.002" is acceptable or should I aim for 0.0015" across?
Follow Ups	Main bearing clearance questions - Placuch 17:46:30 08/19/16 I'd widen #4 to .0015 Tight is never good on Bearings (n/m) - Cjw3 18:14:46 08/19/16 Re: I'd widen #4 to .0015 Tight is never good on Bearings - Placuch 18:38:34 08/19/16 what bearing size is in #4? (n/m) - Cjw3 10:34:07 08/20/16 It is standard if that's what you mean. The back if the bear - Placuch 01:03:41 08/21/16 It will have a grade number 0-4 0=Small 4=Big (n/m) - Cjw3 10:18:03 08/21/16 It seems my crankshaft counterweights were shaved. - Placuch 10:10:39 08/24/16 Theyre stamped on the front lobe - -Grimm- 12:00:54 08/24/16 Your link is very helpful. I did not see that page before - Placuch 19:54:21 08/24/16 Your link is very helpful. I did not see that page before - Placuch 20:03:22 08/24/16
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.