Subject	I'd say do the test via the ECU
Posted by	300ZMang on May 23, 2013 at 2:39 PM
	This message has been viewed 194 times.
In Reply To	Looking at these graphs, you may be correct... posted by puchy on May 23, 2013 at 02:12 PM
Message	also you can supposedly "reset" the ECU by unhooking the battery for ~30 minutes
Follow Ups	Timing at WOT... - puchy 12:06:52 05/23/13 I'm no tuning expert by any means - 300ZMang 13:19:08 05/23/13 Yeah, the base is 15 but depending on load it will change... - puchy 13:40:27 05/23/13 Timing should not be bouncy at idle, it should be smooth. - TriniTT 10:58:55 05/24/13 Thanks - 300ZMang 11:11:55 05/24/13 Just trying to clear the confusion. - TriniTT 11:49:12 05/24/13 Ah yes, so "cold" timing at idle is what my brain was - 300ZMang 11:53:25 05/24/13 Yes, I could call SZ and I bet Greg or Seb will give.... - puchy 20:11:12 05/24/13 thats the nature of timing to decrease at high rpm and load - Dane (Houston) 13:27:52 05/23/13 Re: thats the nature of timing to decrease at high rpm and load - puchy 14:04:39 05/23/13 Looking at these graphs, you may be correct... - puchy 14:12:30 05/23/13 I'd say do the test via the ECU - 300ZMang 14:39:39 05/23/13 Yeah. Pretty obvious. Talk to ZromTech. - OverZealous (CT) 15:10:40 05/23/13 I will be reseting the ECU as soon as I get home and recheck (n/m) - puchy 15:54:46 05/23/13 checking the timing map with my conzult, I notice that... - puchy 08:11:38 05/24/13 That's not OEM. Might be normal for SZ chip. - OverZealous (CT) 18:54:27 05/25/13
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.