Subject	Re: FSM states 4mm, I wouldn't push much past that.
Posted by	MaxxAction on September 02, 2012 at 12:52 PM
	This message has been viewed 174 times.
In Reply To	FSM states 4mm, I wouldn't push much past that. (n/m) posted by TriniTT on September 02, 2012 at 11:45 AM
Message	That is where it is to be set when the belt is new... As time goes by the belt stretches, and the tensioner gap expands. When I did the job on my na, it had 78k on it and had never been done, the gap was about twice what it should be when new. The tensioner will actually go almost ten and still have some tension, but usually by that time the belt has jumped.
Follow Ups	Extending 60K mileage requirement for timing belt change - Pittsman 20:41:58 08/31/12 Really doesn't matter if it's a coupe or 2+2 -- all are - jzack 22:34:42 08/31/12 Re: Extending 60K mileage requirement for timing belt change - MaxxAction 15:26:29 09/01/12 FSM states 4mm, I wouldn't push much past that. (n/m) - TriniTT 11:45:57 09/02/12 Re: FSM states 4mm, I wouldn't push much past that. - MaxxAction 12:52:29 09/02/12 I don't think the belt stretches - aliaZ 07:44:27 09/04/12 The belt usually looks great everywhere except where >> - ZUL8TR 14:40:49 09/04/12 Re: The belt usually looks great everywhere except where >> - MaxxAction 19:11:15 09/04/12 Prior to this 92 I had a1975 280z. Then stayed away >> - ZUL8TR 19:45:10 09/04/12
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.