Subject	since you have a 94 NA ecu (16 bit) your best bet
Posted by	ztunerz on June 17, 2012 at 1:51 AM
	This message has been viewed 159 times.
In Reply To	ECU question posted by getnmoore on June 16, 2012 at 06:35 PM
Message	would be to get a 90 - 93 tt ecu which is easier / cheaper to tune. Harry Formerly yellowzxtt
Follow Ups	ECU question - getnmoore 18:35:56 06/16/12 NA can work but certain functions won't be there. - kkrofft (OH) 19:03:32 06/16/12 Socket/chip your NA ECU. (n/m) - Stadsport (PHX) 20:26:43 06/16/12 Ashspec can convert your NA ECU to TT ECU. - ForceFedTT (SoCal) 20:51:47 06/16/12 ^^^ That's what I did, went for the boost controller too. (n/m) - BlackholeZ 01:49:44 06/17/12 Use TT ecu, TT fuel controller & TT fuel pump (n/m) - Bernie (NoVA) 21:04:24 06/16/12 ^This, why am I reading anything besides this? (n/m) - TriniTT 11:22:21 06/17/12 Isn't 94 a 16 bit? Get a TT ECU (n/m) - toykoz32 01:48:00 06/17/12 since you have a 94 NA ecu (16 bit) your best bet - ztunerz 01:51:45 06/17/12 2nd - aliaZ 08:02:09 06/17/12 94s are 8 bit (n/m) - JMartz 13:01:18 06/17/12
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.