Subject	and losing 2 MPG is not worth it for
Posted by	zellamay on November 13, 2011 at 1:01 PM
	This message has been viewed 120 times.
In Reply To	The ratios are 4.08, and 3.67, so if you divide them out, posted by zellamay on November 10, 2011 at 02:52 PM
Message	the increased acceleration. These cars go like rockets already, and, in case nobody noticed, we're running out of oil.
Follow Ups	tt swap to na differential - sonnymarton 20:59:48 11/09/11 Re: tt swap to na differential - sonnymarton 21:30:29 11/09/11 everything - thumper 23:02:54 11/09/11 Re: everything - sonnymarton 23:10:18 11/09/11 ZIP - MidLifeZ (DFW) 06:25:57 11/10/11 Re: ZIP - sonnymarton 07:19:53 11/10/11 It's math. Compare gear ratios to get a rough - zellamay 08:07:10 11/10/11 Re: It's math. Compare gear ratios to get a rough - sonnymarton 11:52:35 11/10/11 The ratios are 4.08, and 3.67, so if you divide them out, - zellamay 14:52:25 11/10/11 and losing 2 MPG is way worth it for - MidLifeZ (DFW) 07:19:21 11/13/11 and losing 2 MPG is not worth it for - zellamay 13:01:31 11/13/11 It has more to do with the efficiency of the engine... - -Grimm- 14:15:12 11/13/11 Disagree. Far and above, the 2 biggest factors in mileage - zellamay 16:37:09 11/13/11
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.