Subject	I believe 740s are still closer to .77ms. A rich idle
Posted by	treese88 on September 02, 2011 at 9:43 AM
	This message has been viewed 84 times.
In Reply To	By the way... posted by Stadsport (PHX) on September 01, 2011 at 03:18 PM
Message	generally is a bit smoother so whoever tuned the .83ms probably raised the latency for that reason (my car idles better at 14.0 vs 14.7 idle afr)...not how I would do it but it works. Are you sure that is an off-the-shelf tune and Nismo injectors because I find that latency strange.. '91 TT
Follow Ups	Injector Latency for 555s - Stadsport (PHX) 18:39:51 08/31/11 Niether is "better" - sandmanz32 20:13:32 08/31/11 Latency... not pulsewidth... (n/m) - Stadsport (PHX) 21:01:29 08/31/11 2 terms for the same thing - sandmanz32 10:32:37 09/01/11 Not really.. - Stadsport (PHX) 15:12:02 09/01/11 Interesting - sandmanz32 18:50:39 09/02/11 Re: Interesting - Stadsport (PHX) 21:32:41 09/02/11 Latency mainly effects idle and I believe .77ms is about - treese88 12:01:17 09/01/11 correct (n/m) - The Devils Z 14:35:09 09/01/11 Re: Latency mainly effects idle and I believe .77ms is about - Stadsport (PHX) 15:14:06 09/01/11 By the way... - Stadsport (PHX) 15:18:59 09/01/11 I believe 740s are still closer to .77ms. A rich idle - treese88 09:43:33 09/02/11 I'll stick to .77ms then - Stadsport (PHX) 21:35:17 09/02/11
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.