Subject	Re: Latency mainly effects idle and I believe .77ms is about
Posted by	Stadsport (PHX) on September 01, 2011 at 3:14 PM
	This message has been viewed 96 times.
In Reply To	Latency mainly effects idle and I believe .77ms is about posted by treese88 on September 01, 2011 at 12:01 PM
Message	Thanks. There's more difference between the two tunes, and they're from two different tuners. I'll stick to the one using .77ms. My point in asking from the beginning was in the interest of a more stable/smooth/clean idle, so it sounds like that's the way to go.
Follow Ups	Injector Latency for 555s - Stadsport (PHX) 18:39:51 08/31/11 Niether is "better" - sandmanz32 20:13:32 08/31/11 Latency... not pulsewidth... (n/m) - Stadsport (PHX) 21:01:29 08/31/11 2 terms for the same thing - sandmanz32 10:32:37 09/01/11 Not really.. - Stadsport (PHX) 15:12:02 09/01/11 Interesting - sandmanz32 18:50:39 09/02/11 Re: Interesting - Stadsport (PHX) 21:32:41 09/02/11 Latency mainly effects idle and I believe .77ms is about - treese88 12:01:17 09/01/11 correct (n/m) - The Devils Z 14:35:09 09/01/11 Re: Latency mainly effects idle and I believe .77ms is about - Stadsport (PHX) 15:14:06 09/01/11 By the way... - Stadsport (PHX) 15:18:59 09/01/11 I believe 740s are still closer to .77ms. A rich idle - treese88 09:43:33 09/02/11 I'll stick to .77ms then - Stadsport (PHX) 21:35:17 09/02/11
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.