Subject	Its better to be safe than sorry...
Posted by	Kaz (Dallas) on July 25, 2008 at 10:42 AM
	This message has been viewed 255 times.
In Reply To	Timing belt, wear vs years vs miles posted by scott1ct on July 25, 2008 at 10:34 AM
Message	But obviously if you've had it checked... no big... but just think what the cost of a new engine will be if that timing belt setup does develop an issue... Also, just to be clear, the 60k maintenance is not just the "belt". I'd be more worried about the idler pullies and the tensioner than I would about the belt itself... =/ But its your Z, and your money. But don't come crying if the belt does break and you didn't adhere to the suggested maintenance... you won't get any sympathy here. Kaz (Dallas) '07 G35S & '08 G37S
Follow Ups	Timing belt, wear vs years vs miles - scott1ct 10:34:09 07/25/08 Its better to be safe than sorry... - Kaz (Dallas) 10:42:11 07/25/08 I've seen two old timing belts like yours that looked brand - robo (sebring1970) 10:49:13 07/25/08 What did your former mechanic tell you to do? ;-) - Dave N 10:50:24 07/25/08 Look at it this way. That is a few hundred spent on your - 600ZXR 11:39:02 07/25/08 I bought my '91tt in '93 and it had 8,300 miles on it. - not4resaleZ 14:27:47 07/25/08 Anyone install the Greddy Kevlar timing belt ? - TTkeeper 14:39:59 07/25/08 I thought it sounded great, and perhaps good for longer - not4resaleZ 17:42:23 07/25/08 The manual says to change the belt based on miles, not time - Technomancer 14:57:53 07/25/08 My FSM says 60k or 5 yrs., whichever comes 1st. My TT - ThunderZ 06:54:09 07/26/08 Really? Wow. Could you tell me what page? My manual, page - Technomancer 15:50:14 07/26/08 Even the on-line manual it says it on page MA-4 - ThunderZ 10:07:33 07/27/08
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.