Subject	oops (n/m)
Posted by	Spee on July 06, 2004 at 5:53 PM
	This message has been viewed 127 times.
In Reply To	JWT ecu or ASH spec ECU????? posted by AllAboutDaZ on July 06, 2004 at 02:11 PM
Message
Follow Ups	JWT ecu or ASH spec ECU????? - AllAboutDaZ 14:11:57 07/06/04 close. you left out the poll part. :\ (n/m) - ni[X]it 17:47:04 07/06/04 oops (n/m) - Spee 17:53:48 07/06/04 oh no almost had it: can you guy just help - AllAboutDaZ 17:57:43 07/06/04 JWT (n/m) - Spee 18:09:14 07/06/04 thanks for the answer Spee (n/m) - AllAboutDaZ 18:18:01 07/06/04 JWT (n/m) - Chris(NJ) 19:58:40 07/06/04 this has been brought up numerous times but... - SkiFly01 08:52:30 07/08/04 ASH spec ECU????? - Izzy 16:26:23 07/08/04 leaner is safer now ? (n/m) - Chris(NJ) 08:50:26 07/09/04 Leaner than rich is better. "Lean" overall isn't. (n/m) - FlawleZ 16:41:28 07/09/04 Ash (n/m) - SonicZ 02:20:35 07/09/04 JWT (n/m) - Arnel(Z32racing.com) 11:41:27 07/14/04 AshSPEC is about 0.5 leaner than JWT, but still "RICH" in - Ash's Z (In Progress) 17:30:38 08/01/04 AshSPEC is about 0.5 leaner than JWT, but still "RICH" in - Ash's Z (In Progress) 21:11:03 08/01/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.