Subject	Cost savings, to keep prices down with the strengthening yen (n/m)
Posted by	Barry (NJ) on May 13, 2019 at 2:40 PM
	This message has been viewed 274 times.
In Reply To	Re: Correct. 95 and 96 were "rubber delete" in that area posted by VinZmax on May 13, 2019 at 12:12 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Question about front nose panel... - VinZmax 18:29:24 05/12/19 Drill holes, use nuts. Move on. (n/m) - Bernie (NoVA) 20:54:17 05/12/19 Re: Drill holes, use nuts. Move on. - LJZTT 15:48:58 05/14/19 Re: Question about front nose panel... - Rob260 22:43:27 05/12/19 Re: Re: Question about front nose panel... - VinZmax 08:40:56 05/13/19 The 1996 did not have the holes drilled. I drilled and added - RonZ300 (Socal) 08:45:38 05/13/19 Re: The 1996 did not have the holes drilled. I drilled and added - VinZmax 10:38:36 05/13/19 How to post... - Barry (NJ) 14:45:05 05/13/19 Correct. 95 and 96 were "rubber delete" in that area - ZXoltan 12:07:39 05/13/19 Re: Correct. 95 and 96 were "rubber delete" in that area - VinZmax 12:12:54 05/13/19 Cost savings, to keep prices down with the strengthening yen (n/m) - Barry (NJ) 14:40:48 05/13/19 Your conclusions are all wrong. - Bernie (NoVA) 00:50:48 05/14/19 Re: Your conclusions are all wrong. - VinZmax 15:08:23 05/14/19 Well, you're saying the engineers decided they weren't - Barry (NJ) 09:32:02 05/15/19 Re: Well, you're saying the engineers decided they weren't - VinZmax 12:49:21 05/15/19 Speaking of undoing engineering decisions - Adam (NoVA) 22:43:02 05/17/19 True. (n/m) - Bernie (NoVA) 14:04:48 05/20/19 wow didnt know about the T-top deflectors - LJZTT 15:50:31 05/14/19 Yea they serve a small purpose (n/m) - FrozTTy 12:12:47 05/18/19
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.