Subject	agreed... (n/m)
Posted by	Barry (NJ) on April 02, 2019 at 8:30 AM
	This message has been viewed 174 times.
In Reply To	yep, not indicative of the rest of the Z's out there at all posted by LJZTT on April 01, 2019 at 06:53 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Two more really strong sales at auction over the weekend. - nelso419 14:17:35 04/01/19 I dig the period correct carphone in the yellow one. (n/m) - CameronSF 14:30:04 04/01/19 lol, 2nd... I was just about to post that (n/m) - vorpalZed 14:57:27 04/01/19 Is it an original factory phone? (n/m) - compirate 17:34:11 04/01/19 True collectors cars. Ultra low miles, no real modifications - Barry (NJ) 15:38:46 04/01/19 yep, not indicative of the rest of the Z's out there at all - LJZTT 18:53:54 04/01/19 agreed... (n/m) - Barry (NJ) 08:30:46 04/02/19 If I had a low mileage car in collector's condition I was - Becker 18:41:31 04/01/19 meh, when Z's with plants growing out through the engine bay - LJZTT 19:01:07 04/01/19 Cosmelone - WhiTTe Z 08:36:20 04/02/19 my how TTnet has fallen from grace.....smh - LJZTT 18:57:05 04/01/19 Call them "RIMS" to see if the Semantic Police are asleep as - Inzane 19:18:07 04/04/19 I had a guy once tell me that he liked my "hubcaps" (n/m) - spicyZ 14:58:52 04/05/19 $35000 invested in 1990 stock market = $93,592 now - TTkeeper 19:15:55 04/05/19 What a time capsule... haven't seen a truly stock Z in ages (n/m) - schuss 01:13:31 04/15/19
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.