Subject	I should clarify, my post was in regards to the
Posted by	MixManMash on February 06, 2017 at 6:18 PM
	This message has been viewed 366 times.
In Reply To	600 on pump shouldn't be a problem with supporting mods. posted by MixManMash on February 06, 2017 at 03:13 PM
Message	GTX2860 gen 2.
Follow Ups	Any input on some of the larger turbos? GTX2971R? - Carlos Ramirez 08:51:41 02/06/17 I think the big problem with the GTX2867s are that the - MixManMash 10:39:41 02/06/17 I'd just go w/ the new GTX2860's. - The Hawk 11:46:51 02/06/17 What are the power goals? - BlackholeZ 13:50:53 02/06/17 1.21 Gigawatts or 1,622,637 HP - Carlos Ramirez 14:26:23 02/06/17 600 on pump shouldn't be a problem with supporting mods. - MixManMash 15:13:10 02/06/17 I should clarify, my post was in regards to the - MixManMash 18:18:06 02/06/17 couldnt you achieve that with jwt700/gt2860rs (n/m) - Jiro 19:49:01 02/06/17 You would be in the low 700s with the right mods. The - MixManMash 20:36:25 02/06/17 The GTX2860R G2 will do that handily - BlackholeZ 22:44:33 02/06/17 What do you think a GTX2971R or a GTX2867R will do - Carlos Ramirez 08:05:52 02/07/17 The 2867 is an unbalanced turbo, as people have said. - BlackholeZ 10:43:52 02/07/17 take a glance at my profile - Carlos Ramirez 15:34:18 02/07/17 I honestly think you'll be happy with the GTX2860R Gen 2. - MixManMash 10:00:07 02/09/17 Holy schneikes, that's impressive (n/m) - boileralum 10:54:51 02/08/17 I think the big thing to remember here is the cylinder head - MixManMash 10:01:11 02/09/17 I'd be very curious to find out what all was done. - boileralum 13:18:51 02/09/17 Re: Any input on some of the larger turbos? GTX2971R? - Dane (Houston) 13:53:15 02/06/17
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.