| I reject this notion that companies and an unelected federal bureaucracy can tell me what I can and cannot do with my private property. It is one thing for a home owners association to have such rules, or a city to have such ordinances within city limits or even a state or county. Those are voluntarily agreed upon terms that you have a recourse against. You dont have to move to that city, you dont have to live in that state. This opens the door for more carguy friendly states and cities to attract the residency (and therefore tax revenue) of car guys. If California wants to force everyone to start walking everywhere, you know because the air will be poisonous otherwise, they are within their right to do that, and then Arizona will say, hey you like cars? Move to Arizona, and CA will be a bankrupt pedestrian paradise by year's end. I don't get to dictate how a carmaker or the federal government allots my money given to them in exchange for that which is now supposedly my property do I? So who has the rights here? It certainly is not the individual.
 "We pretended to work, and they pretended to pay us." --Mikhail Khodorkovsky "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." --Winston Churchill "When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." --Benjamin Franklin "Government is not reason. It is not eloquent. It is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master." "The last official act of any government is to loot the treasury." --George Washington END THE FED ....learn why, in 42 minutes Full Pardon for PFC Bradley Manning |