Subject	Yeah im curious as to the difference and will post it soon
Posted by	eriksu9 on April 28, 2015 at 10:18 AM
	This message has been viewed 260 times.
In Reply To	I don't but I had the same "butt dyno" experience FWIW (n/m) posted by ConVerTT on April 28, 2015 at 10:14 AM
Message	The "response" and "butt dyno" (lol) has changed dramatically!! I didnt expect it... ****CURRENT DYNO RESULTS AS OF 11-18-13 SPORT 700BB TURBOS- 514 RWHP/468 FT TORQUE ON 93 PUMP GAS @ 18 PSI Wiseco 87.5 mm pistons, head work ****OLD DYNO RESULTS: GT28R TURBOS- 438 RWHP ON 93 OCTANE PUMP GAS/STOCK MOTOR**** ****472 RWHP ON 110 RACE GAS******************************* Also own: 2001 Harley Davidson Custom Softail Deuce 1993 Nissan 300ZX 2+2 NA 1997 Ford Explorer XLT V8 AWD 2000 Ford Explorer Eddie Bauer XLT 1991 Yamaha YZ250 Sold: 1985 Ford Bronco 3" lift 35" tires 1986 Yamaha FJ1100 1986 Nissan 300zx na(Z31) 1979 280ZX 2+2 1972 MGB 1968 Pontiac Firebird 1972 Nissan 240Z, dual webber carbs, etc
Follow Ups	Selin kit - eriksu9 10:09:58 04/28/15 I don't but I had the same "butt dyno" experience FWIW (n/m) - ConVerTT 10:14:46 04/28/15 Yeah im curious as to the difference and will post it soon - eriksu9 10:18:13 04/28/15 Yep, even with stock turbos it was noticeable. Helps spool - MixManMash 13:58:17 04/28/15 Ive always had "dual intakes." - eriksu9 11:57:45 04/29/15 The big difference is in the low range - BlackholeZ 19:48:54 04/28/15 there is an old post by SZ (n/m) - The Devils Z 20:35:17 04/28/15 Greg has a in depth post and sounds like you've seen it: - LivinTheDream 11:58:06 04/29/15
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.