Subject	nasty :( (n/m)
Posted by	vorpalZ on November 04, 2014 at 5:56 PM
	This message has been viewed 428 times.
In Reply To	Oklahoma = 91 :( posted by Lumpydonut on November 04, 2014 at 05:27 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Recent Dyno Results - Lumpydonut 13:12:11 11/04/14 Pretty decent numbers with those mods (n/m) - s3trios 13:26:29 11/04/14 My Super Splits had me in the same position. Too much - TTZ2NV(EPTmotorsports) 13:27:01 11/04/14 What octane and boost? (n/m) - AddictedToBoost 13:37:43 11/04/14 91 and 14psi (n/m) - Lumpydonut 13:48:59 11/04/14 I don't think the intercooler piping is a bottleneck - Zvil (FL) 14:24:52 11/04/14 No justification, just a goal I've had for 3 years. - Lumpydonut 15:11:48 11/04/14 93 would have brought up boost levels and you'd be near - vorpalZ 16:35:38 11/04/14 I assume he has stock injectors - Zvil (FL) 16:55:40 11/04/14 Oklahoma = 91 :( - Lumpydonut 17:27:06 11/04/14 nasty :( (n/m) - vorpalZ 17:56:40 11/04/14 Re: 93 would have brought up boost levels and you'd be near - slick007l 13:56:17 11/06/14 If you have the file, it's easy to change mph to rpm - dogpile 14:30:27 11/04/14 Always STD to show higher WHP.... - NIVO88T 17:29:43 11/07/14
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.