Subject	As long as your LCA doesn't go negative
Posted by	Jayru on July 06, 2014 at 3:40 PM
	This message has been viewed 249 times.
In Reply To	Re: Ride height and cornering posted by Bad Fish on July 06, 2014 at 01:17 PM
Message	on the horizontal plane - where the subframe would actually be lower than the outer LCA point, you will be fine (and beneficial to handling). Bumpsteer, etc. is mostly caused by that negative angle (which the R&P/tie rod will mimic). If you exceed the horizontal axis (not sure if this is the best way to describe it), then suspension components (bump steer kits, etc.) should be used to correct it, but you still wouldn't be able to correct the roll center without drop spindles (that don't exist) for our cars. So it's best to keep the ride height where the LCA doesn't go negative. Keeping the car stock ride height to get the "best" handling is just silly. 93 2+2 Twin Turbo Track Build - jsworks.org for more info!
Follow Ups	Ride height and cornering - AddictedToBoost 23:08:04 07/05/14 Yes stock height is best - Turbodog (CT) 05:00:43 07/06/14 Re: Yes stock height is best - AddictedToBoost 23:56:11 07/06/14 my experience as well. I lower the rear more than the front (n/m) - ztunerz 16:18:03 07/07/14 I'm about a half inch off the tire - Jayru 08:13:04 07/06/14 Re: Ride height and cornering - Bad Fish 13:17:41 07/06/14 As long as your LCA doesn't go negative - Jayru 15:40:08 07/06/14 Re: As long as your LCA doesn't go negative - Bad Fish 20:21:37 07/06/14 While I agree with you in theory, and am not looking - Jayru 15:33:57 07/07/14 Re: While I agree with you in theory, and am not looking - Bad Fish 17:21:22 07/07/14 All good points. And I agree that he shouldn't slam the car - Jayru 21:20:59 07/07/14 Re: Ride height and cornering - roninz32tt 03:43:27 07/07/14
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.