Subject	in retrospect, its still about 29mm further out than oem
Posted by	WhiTTe Z on March 01, 2013 at 10:53 AM
	This message has been viewed 223 times.
In Reply To	What gets lost in that pic is fronts look sunken in IMO. posted by white22sky on March 01, 2013 at 09:48 AM
Message	7.5 fronts. Which are really sunken. Lowered a tad with no more than 1.5 degrees negative camber I think would look great. Have any pics of your setup white22sky? src="http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a308/Cantiello22/fds fdssfsfdfsd_zps5c342ec7.jpg?t=1361077244"> "Stance: cuz goin fast cost money yo (n/m) - ZiNnYc 08/09/12 18:23:42"
Follow Ups	Wheel Opinions 17x8 +22 17x9 +36 - WhiTTe Z 18:30:47 02/28/13 Rears will clear front may not be quite as flush - white22sky 19:59:50 02/28/13 will most likely be running - WhiTTe Z 20:11:59 02/28/13 Go wider up front (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 20:22:04 02/28/13 i have 17x9 front and 17x9.5 rear.. not sure offset but fits - DJ2_300zxLover 20:43:26 02/28/13 245/40/17 front .. 275/40/17 rear - DJ2_300zxLover 20:45:13 02/28/13 ^255/40/17 would have been a better choice for your 17x9. (n/m) - 90TT Zfan (E.Tenn) 21:00:59 02/28/13 ^Yes and 4 less Rotas too. (n/m) - white22sky 07:26:57 03/01/13 when i need to get tires ill try 255/40 thnx :P (n/m) - DJ2_300zxLover 11:43:48 03/01/13 Those will fit. Here's what 17x9 +35 and 17x8 +25, with - cherry 08:24:06 03/01/13 thats what I was looking for - WhiTTe Z 09:38:35 03/01/13 What gets lost in that pic is fronts look sunken in IMO. - white22sky 09:48:44 03/01/13 in retrospect, its still about 29mm further out than oem - WhiTTe Z 10:53:04 03/01/13
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.