Subject	I'm guessing he was being facetious ;) (n/m)
Posted by	Ted (92TT) on April 22, 2012 at 3:49 PM
	This message has been viewed 341 times.
In Reply To	Actually, it's closer to 95 but remember, the OEM gauge posted by DVDBURN (MD) on April 22, 2012 at 03:10 PM
Message
Follow Ups	New style 200 mph gauge faces. - DVDBURN (MD) 23:38:57 04/21/12 You just never give up! - KongZTT GT28RS MD 23:47:36 04/21/12 Cool. Glad that lead worked out. 1 more thing for my list :) (n/m) - Ted (92TT) 01:42:41 04/22/12 Nice work. Would still like to send my gauge cluster to you - Boosted1 07:07:47 04/22/12 Glad to hear it! I'm in, will have to work out timing for it (n/m) - BoneZ (MD) 08:51:44 04/22/12 Re: New style 200 mph gauge faces. - GatorJ 09:50:36 04/22/12 Actually, it's closer to 95 but remember, the OEM gauge - DVDBURN (MD) 15:10:04 04/22/12 I'm guessing he was being facetious ;) (n/m) - Ted (92TT) 15:49:12 04/22/12 Re: New style 200 mph gauge faces. - pilikua 10:33:31 04/22/12 A little info about the maximum speed values. - DVDBURN (MD) 15:52:24 04/22/12 :D (n/m) - BoneZ (MD) 00:18:51 04/23/12 Another cool thing about the Dakota Digital signal interface - DVDBURN (MD) 19:16:07 04/22/12 this is great - RobZ32 22:59:00 04/22/12 I keep realizing more things the Dakota interface can do. - DVDBURN (MD) 08:42:28 04/23/12
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.