Subject	Re: Mitch, no offense, but your explanation sounds like
Posted by	Tech@EPR on January 17, 2010 at 10:54 PM
	This message has been viewed 265 times.
In Reply To	Mitch, no offense, but your explanation sounds like posted by LitlElvis on January 17, 2010 at 10:30 PM
Message	no marketing jargle of any kind bud...don't know why you'd think what I had to say would be of marketing value. We had to modify some chevy cranks to a high speed oil system as well. And they worked just like the ones I do for the VGs. There's no difference in the two. You just allow only one access port for oil to feed the bearing is all. The rods are cross drilled just like the mains.
Follow Ups	VG crankshaft oiling = broken crank? - LitlElvis 13:16:58 01/17/10 I don't think feedback posts are useless - S e a r c h 13:58:23 01/17/10 your post is off-topic AND useless... - LitlElvis 14:19:01 01/17/10 OK man, you're grumpy today, my bad (n/m) - S e a r c h 14:22:33 01/17/10 crankshaft oiling has nothing to do with crank failure IMHO - aliaZ 14:14:25 01/17/10 I agree with you 100% about the potential for a non-dampened - LitlElvis 14:27:41 01/17/10 Re: crankshaft oiling has nothing to do with crank failure IMHO - Tech@EPR 15:24:29 01/17/10 Stay with it Brett - ubermiach 14:25:12 01/17/10 Heres a quick calculation showing the backpressure - CaliguyPurdue (Selin Design) 15:34:39 01/17/10 Nice!! now this is what I'm talking about TT.net... - LitlElvis 18:51:19 01/17/10 Re: VG crankshaft oiling = broken crank? - Tech@EPR 15:41:51 01/17/10 Yes, two rods feed from each main. My picture shows only - LitlElvis 18:27:29 01/17/10 Re: Yes, two rods feed from each main. My picture shows only - Tech@EPR 20:54:23 01/17/10 Mitch, no offense, but your explanation sounds like - LitlElvis 22:30:16 01/17/10 Re: Mitch, no offense, but your explanation sounds like - Tech@EPR 22:54:51 01/17/10
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.