TwinTurbo.NET: Nissan 300ZX forum - Re: crankshaft oiling has nothing to do with crank failure IMHO
Subject
Re: crankshaft oiling has nothing to do with crank failure IMHO
Posted by
Tech@EPR
on January 17, 2010 at 3:24 PM
This message has been viewed
299
times.
In Reply To
crankshaft oiling has nothing to do with crank failure IMHO
posted by aliaZ
on January 17, 2010 at 02:14 PM
Message
yep I totally agree with this as well. You'd be amazed at how much harmonics are being given off when the crank is going in for being balanced. The harmonics at 1k HP level with the amount of RPM running is quite significant.
Follow Ups
VG crankshaft oiling = broken crank?
-
LitlElvis
13:16:58 01/17/10
I don't think feedback posts are useless
-
S e a r c h
13:58:23 01/17/10
your post is off-topic AND useless...
-
LitlElvis
14:19:01 01/17/10
OK man, you're grumpy today, my bad (n/m)
-
S e a r c h
14:22:33 01/17/10
crankshaft oiling has nothing to do with crank failure IMHO
-
aliaZ
14:14:25 01/17/10
I agree with you 100% about the potential for a non-dampened
-
LitlElvis
14:27:41 01/17/10
Re: crankshaft oiling has nothing to do with crank failure IMHO -
Tech@EPR
15:24:29 01/17/10
Stay with it Brett
-
ubermiach
14:25:12 01/17/10
Heres a quick calculation showing the backpressure
-
CaliguyPurdue (Selin Design)
15:34:39 01/17/10
Nice!! now this is what I'm talking about TT.net...
-
LitlElvis
18:51:19 01/17/10
Re: VG crankshaft oiling = broken crank?
-
Tech@EPR
15:41:51 01/17/10
Yes, two rods feed from each main. My picture shows only
-
LitlElvis
18:27:29 01/17/10
Re: Yes, two rods feed from each main. My picture shows only
-
Tech@EPR
20:54:23 01/17/10
Mitch, no offense, but your explanation sounds like
-
LitlElvis
22:30:16 01/17/10
Re: Mitch, no offense, but your explanation sounds like
-
Tech@EPR
22:54:51 01/17/10
Post a
Followup
You cannot reply to this message because you are not
logged in
.