Subject	Muscle....or sport compact????
Posted by	Z-tarded on October 12, 2008 at 2:19 PM
	This message has been viewed 349 times.
Message	Was at a grand opening of a local shop Saturday. They had free food, a car show (general), and 2 pulls for 30 bones on their DynoJet. There were trophies for two different catagories in the dyno-pull. Highest HP Muscle Car and highest HP for Sport Compact. There was also a dud HP catagory for lowest HP :) Anyway, the line drawn between Muscle and Sport Compact was 3.0 litre. Anything less was Sport and anything "at" or over was muscle. I didn't dyno my 91 TT...since I saw no point. I'm waiting to get go fast parts applied next week and then getting it dyno tuned anyway. But if I had dyno pulled at the event, my car would have fallen into the "Muscle" catagory they said. I know they had to draw a line somewhere with the two catagories....but it just got me thinking about muscle vs. Sport and where I believe the Z car with its 3.0 L ought to be. Our cars can be built to easily surpass a bunch of NA muscle as far as HP goes....do we have "new muscle" then...or should we consider it old sport??? Any comments???
Follow Ups	Muscle....or sport compact???? - Z-tarded 14:19:25 10/12/08 You could have argued the point that the VG30 is actually - Waggz 14:27:14 10/12/08 lol +2 (n/m) - 93Z32Driver 17:59:24 10/12/08 my .02 - s_stinson (SATX) 15:15:04 10/12/08 the Z is not a muscle car - aliaZ 17:48:36 10/12/08 That's exactly what I was thinking.....and my handle - Z-tarded 18:54:07 10/12/08 lol at the liter requirement - Drk93TT 19:39:18 10/12/08 I dont think its too crazy to consider Z's japanese muscle (n/m) - AntiHero 08:32:18 10/13/08
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.